Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Even Their Scholars Descend into Absurdity

by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr., Th.D., Director of NiceneCouncil.com

I have long made the distinction between scholarly dispensationalists (e.g., Charles Ryrie, John Walvoord, and sometimes Dwight Pentecost) and the populist dispensationalists (e.g., Hal Lindsey, Tim LaHaye, and anyone else with book sales over 15 billion copies). I did this out of respect for the more thoughtful presentations in the scholars' writings. But now I don’t know what possessed me to do this. Let me explain and illustrate the blurring of the lines separating populist dispensationalists from the “scholarly” ones.

Generally the “scholarly” dispensationalists present the more theological and exegetical foundations for the system. Whereas the populists run grinning and skipping full-bore into date-setting, rapture-predicting, Antichrist-portending, Armageddon military-operation-plan describing (OPLANs), newspaper-exegeting, system-contradicting inane, vacuous, absurd, silly, vapid, pointless, fatuous, insubstantial slop. They do this for the mere pleasure of fleecing the sheep of untold millions of dollars of their non-invested, discretionary funds.

However, I have begun to question this distinction between populist and scholar in dispensationalism. And I even wonder why I ever allowed such a distinction. Though it is true that the populists never attempt any scholarly-sounding, exegetically-rigorous, theologically-astute presentations of their system, it is most certainly not true that the “scholars” are not lured into crass money-making publications. Consider the following books by the more reputable dispensationalist “scholars” Ryrie and Walvoord. (I believe that Pentecost also wrote one, but fortunately I have lost it.)

Walvoord published his newspaper-exegesis book Armageddon, Oil and the Middle East Crisis: What the Bible Says about the Future of the Middle East and the End of Western Civilization in 1974 and again in 1976. Then when the first Gulf War broke out, he revised and re-released it in 1990 whereupon it became a multi-million bestseller, making him so much money that he had to invest it in long-term real estate ventures.

Walvoord not only provides devotional readings from the newspapers, avoids indexing the book, and resists footnotes (as do populists), but he provides a table of “Prophetic Events in History Beginning with the Babylonian Captivity” (on pp. 107–08). And what are some of these “prophecies” (none of which should be occurring in the church age while awaiting the signless, imminent rapture)? Here are a few that may surprise you (I know they surprised the aluminum storm door salesman that came by my house yesterday):

• "1945: Rise of Russia and Communism to power."
(Gentry comment and analysis: Who would have known this would occur in 1945? This is an amazing prophecy. Of course, once you break the number down you will see obvious clues: 1 stands for the first commandment; 9 for number of centuries lived by Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Jared, Methuselah, Noah, Peleg (Gen 5; 9:29; 11:19); 4 for the number of Jacob’s sons whose name starts with the letter “j” [Judah and Joseph] multiplied by 2; 5 is a number often thought of while milking four-uddered cows.)

• "1946: Beginning of world government: United Nations formed."
(Gentry comment and analysis: Notice prophecy’s strange silence about “cheese.”)

• "1948: Israel established as a nation in the land: third return."
(Gentry comment and analysis: This date was necessary to get us into the age of television which would give rise to tele-evangelism.)

• "1956: Israel extends territory."
(Gentry comment and analysis: Carefully notice how this is but eight years after 1948. Need I say more?)

• "1967: Israel regains territory."
(Gentry comment and analysis: This is not the year of the invention of aluminum foil. Though on January 5 of this year Spain and Romania sign in Paris an agreement establishing full consular and commercial relations, though, sadly, not diplomatic ones.)

• "1975: Egypt reopens the Suez Canal."
(Gentry comment and analysis: Though apparently there is no clear prophecy discussing the original dredging of the Suez and the actual building of this particular canal.)

• "1979: Camp David Accords: peace with Egypt."
(Gentry comment and analysis: Little did Jimmy Carter know he was the subject of biblical prophecy, though obviously before he occurred in history peanuts had to be invented. This co-ordination of events then becomes a remarkable demonstration of God’s providence. Sadly though, peanut butter was invented before peanuts themselves, then had to await the later arrival of its main ingredient. Consequently, it originally sold very poorly as a jar of brown butter.)

• "1982: Israel attacks PLO in Lebanon."
(Gentry comment and analysis: I wish he had given the Bible verse backing up this one. I know the letters “p,” “l,” and “o” occur in Scripture, but they appear to be randomly placed rather than carefully articulated. Of course, their “gap theory” may account for this for we note that all three of these letters occur in their proper order in Gen 2:9: “And out of the ground the Lord God caused to grow every tree that is Pleasing to the sight and good for food; the tree of Life also in the midst Of the garden, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.” This cannot be sheer chance. Unless of course you suppose that 1,000,000 monkies typing on 1,000,000 typewriters for 1,000,000 years produced The Late Great Planet Earth -- a view I confess to holding when I was a cartoon character.)

• "1990: Saddam Hussein, in preparation to attack Israel, seizes Kuwait."
(Gentry comment and analysis: Hussein’s name is difficult to find in biblical prophecy [though not impossible if you are double-jointed]. However, “Kuwait” is found all over both the Old Testament and the New Testament. I think.)

And what of Charles Ryrie, perhaps the most important, articulate, and prominent of dispensationalism’s “scholars”? In 1976 he presented the waiting world with The Living End, which was described on the cover as: “Enlightening and astonishing disclosures about the coming last days of earth.” In 1982 he released The Bible and Tomorrow’s News. Then during the first Gulf War he re-released it as The Final Countdown and enjoyed reprints in 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, and beyond (I quit buying it after the fourth reprint so I don’t know how many more followed. And I am too tired to look it up.)

I will provide just one more disappointing evidence of absurdity among these “scholars.” In Walvoord’s Prophecy in the New Millennium (2001) we read the following discussion of the massive New Jerusalem:

“Clearly, the New Jerusalem could not rest on the earth because it is described as such a huge city that it would blot out the whole Promised Land, making impossible the fulfillment of other elements of the millennial kingdom. . . . It would have to be a satellite city, situated in space. . . . It may be that those who have been resurrected or translated will live in this satellite city over the earth.”

Consequently, though I will tip my hat to the likes of Ryrie and Walvoord in their attempts to establish secure foundations for the dispensational system, I will not be as quick to point to them as scholars who are immune from the lures of populism and absurdity. Such temptations are endemic to the whole system which reads like a rejected script from television’s Hee-Haw. Junior Samples refused to lower himself to such far-fetched scenarios. He was afraid it would hurt his used car business.


lee n. field said...

"Armageddon, Oil and the Middle East Crisis:"

I picked up this for the same reason -- Walvoord is supposed to be one of the credible guys to read.

I found it appalling. He makes no attempt to argue for dispensationalism, he simply asserts it. The book will reinforce dispensational belief, if that's what you hold, but I found it poorly argued.

Just another prophecy book on the pile.

Anonymous said...

I am 75 years old.For the first and only time in my life my Heavenly Father gave me a vision of these words. Jesus Christ is Coming Soon. As soon as I read the words they disappeared. Scriptures tells us that YAHWEH will create a new heaven and a new earth on which dwelleth righteousness and there will be no more seas. It will be a bigger planet to have the New Jerusalem on it. My LORD YAHWEH is not a liar. HE means what HE says and says what HE means.

Vance said...


Notice that in Revelation 21:1 (the new heaven and new earth), John tells us of something he saw. In Revelation 12, John tells us of something else he saw. The text plainly says "woman," not "church" and not "Israel." Does Yahweh "mean what He says and say what He means" in chapter 12? If so, is this woman really clothed with the sun?

aztexan said...

Excellent! Thank you for this humorous take on a serious subject. When it comes to the prevalence of ditz-spin-sensationalism in these dark days, if I don't occasionally laugh I'll cry.

Leanna said...

Thank you for the humor. I needed it. I was in disp. and taught it some over the past 20 years. Then I went through an in depth study of the book of Hebrews. During that study and debate with pastors online my disp. came tumbling down and now lays in a heap at my feet. My desire is to go back to those I have taught and attempt to correct the error I have participated in. What I thought was the truth now I see as blasphemous that God would ever set up another sacrificial system in the so called millennium. To do so would regard as unclean the sacrifice of Christ and insult the Spirit of Grace.

slee8@cableone.net said...

Hey, Junior Samples was great. As a kid I never missed an episode of Hee Haw.

However, I am no longer a dispensationalist. And like, Leanna wrote, I am trying to go back to dispensationalist friends and correct those errors. Funny thing is they are all changing their views away from dispensationalism also.

The best thing is I am free of such a muddled and confusing system.

Anonymous said...

A comment to Leanna and Dr. Gentry...

In Old Testament times, an animal sacrifice NEVER had the power to take away our sins, correct? Then why did God require animal sacrifices at all? If believing there will not be animal sacrifices in the future because Christ fulfilled the necessary sacrifice that truly takes away sin, then it would seem to me, that ALL future OR PAST animal sacrifices were and are really unnecessary. But we know that God DID require animal sacrifices, even though HE KNEW they can't truly cover and cleanse us of our sins. HE KNEW in Old Testament times that Christ was coming to die and be the One true Sacrifice. My point? It wasn't blasphemy to have ineffective animal sacrifices during the Old Testament times while looking forward to the coming true Sacrifice. I don't see it as blasphemy to conduct animal sacrifices in the future to look back at the One true Sacrifice. Both sides look to Christ. One looks forward the other looks back. I see no "insult" to the "Spirit of Grace."